Posted on: Dec 13,2019
Your employer must be procedurally fair during a disciplinary investigation. The case of Retirement Security Ltd v Miss A. Wilson illustrates the impact of a flawed disciplinary investigation on an unfair dismissal claim. Here, the procedural defects in an investigatory meeting were so bad that the Employment Tribunal concluded that there had been a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence, which entitled Miss Wilson to resign and claim constructive dismissal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal also agreed.
Miss Wilson worked as a manager of a retirement community in which older people lived independently. Managers who reported to her accused her of potentially serious misconduct and her manager invited her to an investigatory meeting. She was only given 24 hours’ notice of the meeting, not given information about what the meeting was to discuss except a bullet point list containing allegations such as “attempted theft” and her (unrequested) “companion” subsequently took the role of Chair of the meeting. After the meeting, she resigned because she had concluded that the employer had already decided that she was guilty of misconduct without giving her a fair hearing or proper sight of the evidence. The Employment Tribunal upheld her constructive unfair dismissal claim, and Retirement Security Limited appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT).
The EAT agreed with the Employment Tribunal that there had been a breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence and that Miss Wilson had resigned in response. Although the ACAS Code on Disciplinary and Grievance procedures does not require exactly the same standards of procedural fairness and natural justice for disciplinary investigations as it does for formal disciplinary proceedings, that was beside the point. Each case depends on its particular circumstances and also depends on whether the employer has acted without reasonable and proper cause in a manner that is likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of trust and confidence. The conduct of the investigation meeting in this case was so flawed that it amounted to such a breach and the employer had not advanced a case that the dismissal was for a potentially fair reason.
The information and content on this website is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. Legal information or content on this website relates only to the laws of England and Wales. You should not take any actions based on information found on this website without first seeking appropriate legal advice with respect to your specific matter. No representations or warranties are made about the suitability, currentness, comprehensiveness and/or accuracy of the information and other content contained on this website. It should be noted that legal information and content can rapidly become out of date and we give no undertaking to keep this website up to date. All liability for any loss or damage of any kind which may be suffered as a result of accessing and using the information and/or content of this website is hereby excluded to the full extent permitted by law.