This page can be viewed with a Silver Library Subscription. For £9.99 you can access the information and guidance here for 3 months. Simply log in if you already have a subscription to this page.
Being suspended from work is a temporary status determined by your employer where allegations of gross misconduct have been made against you, are being investigated, but have not been established or dismissed. You should only be suspended for gross misconduct, although you can be suspended for health and safety reasons. This page takes you briefly through your rights and your employer’s obligations during suspension. For more detailed guidance See – Suspended from work: Understand the process, know your rights and survive it
Suspension is the result of a decision by your employer that the usual employment relationship cannot function effectively while the investigation (or situation) is continuing. It does not mean that you are culpable. You are entitled to the presumption of innocence of the gross misconduct being investigated.
as brief as possible;
kept under review; and
should not be used as a disciplinary sanction
Suspension must be on full pay unless your contract of employment says otherwise. There is no general or implied right to suspend an employee without pay. It is up to your employer to prove that they are entitled to suspend you without pay.
Suspension will catch you by surprise in circumstances where you would not have had any opportunity to prepare or even know fully what the allegation is against you. It may lead to you losing your job and is not something to be taken lightly.
Even though Suspension is not an indication that you are guilty of any offence, being suspended damages your reputation in the workplace and potentially with clients and customers if they find out about it. You will also be unable to practice your skills whilst off work because you are still employed and bound by your employment contract (unless your employment contract says differently).
You have rights during the period of suspension because you are still an employee. The ACAS Code 1 applies to any matters relating to discipline. Your employer has a legal duty to act reasonably and use a fair procedure. The ACAS Guide gives directions on what it is to act reasonably and fairly, and the duties are further developed by the Courts and Tribunals in case law.
Principles of a fair procedure are laid out in the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance procedures, rules of natural justice, your employment contract (or collective agreement) and your employer’s internal disciplinary procedure. Essentially, there should be a reasonable suspicion of gross misconduct and your employer should undertake an initial investigation before making the decision to suspend. Your employer must follow contractual procedures relating to suspension correctly.
The ACAS Code says that whenever a disciplinary process is being followed it is important that your employer deals with issues reasonably and fairly. This means that;
In McLoughlin v Setanta Insurance Services  the High Court considered the issues of suspension at the beginning of a disciplinary process and the fairness of that decision to suspend. Miss McLoughlin asked the court for an injunction ordering Setanta Insurance to take her off suspension because the decision to suspend her was unfair and in breach of fair procedures. She also said that the suspension letter was simply a ‘dressed up attempt’ by Setanta Insurance to dismiss her on the grounds of gross misconduct and get out of paying her any notice payments. The High Court said that the letter of suspension read as if Setanta Insurance had already reached a determination of guilt against Miss McLoughlin. The High Court rescinded her suspension because it was clear that Setanta Insurance had already decided that she was guilty of gross misconduct.
In Camden and Islington Mental Health and Social Care Trust v Atkinson , Mrs Camden was a nurse who was suspended over allegations of her mistreatment of two patients. At her suspension meting one of the allegations was found to be unfounded but Camden and Islington Mental Health Trust did not lift the suspension. During the suspension Mrs Camden retired. Later, she claimed unfair constructive dismissal at the Employment Tribunal. The case went to the Employment Appeal Tribunal who said that although she had stated that she was retiring, the real reason for her resignation was her continuing suspension which the EAT found to be a fundamental breach of her contract.
The EAT found that Camden and Islington Mental Health Trust had breached the implied term of trust and confidence. The main reason that she resigned was not for retirement but because of the continuing suspension. The EAT said that Mrs Camden had been constructively unfairly dismissed.
In Agoreyo v London Borough of Lambeth, a teacher was suspended because of the force she used with two children. She had not been asked for her response to the allegations and there was no evidence of consideration given to any alternative to suspension. She resigned the same day. The High Court said that suspension is not a neutral act, at least in the context of a qualified professional in a vocation, such as a teacher. Taking into account the statutory guidance for local authorities, it was noted that a knee-jerk reaction must be avoided and that suspension must not be the default position. The reason given for the suspension was not the protection of children, but to “allow the investigation to be conducted fairly”.
The Court concluded that suspension was adopted as the default position, was a knee-jerk reaction, and amounted to a repudiatory breach of contract. This was not undermined by a resignation in friendly terms.
There must be a good reason for suspension. The ACAS Guide to Disciplinary and Grievance procedures complements the Code. The non-statutory guidance says that suspension with pay may be necessary while investigations are being carried out. You should only be suspended;
To justify suspension, your employer must have good reason to believe your continued presence in the workplace could create further problems, and should be prepared to provide evidence of this.
The ACAS Guide says that the fact that your employer has reason to suspect that you have been engaged in misconduct, or even gross misconduct, does not of itself justify suspension pending investigation. Your employer must consider alternatives to suspension such as redeployment or working from home.
There is an implied contract term that an employer will only exercise the right to suspend on reasonable grounds. In the case of McClory & others v The Post Office , the High Court said that even though there is no general contractual obligation on an employer to act reasonably or fairly in suspending an employee, an employer must;
Have reasonable grounds for the suspension;
Ensure that the period of the suspension is reasonable
In addition, whether a suspension is reasonable or not will depend on events as they occurred. Reasonableness is not judged with hindsight.
The Employment Tribunal and the Courts cannot substitute their own view of “reasonableness” for that of your employer. It is up to your employer to say what they thought was reasonable in the given circumstances and show the procedure that they used to come to that conclusion. The Employment Tribunal or Court will then look at the circumstances and the procedure and agree or disagree with your employer.
Worksmart – I have been suspended from work
In Harrison v. Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, the High Court cancelled Ms Harrison’s suspension and ordered the Trust to let her resume her duties…Read more
The information and content on this website is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal or other professional advice. Legal information or content on this website relates only to the laws of England and Wales. You should not take any actions based on information found on this website without first seeking appropriate legal advice with respect to your specific matter. No representations or warranties are made about the suitability, currentness, comprehensiveness and/or accuracy of the information and other content contained on this website. It should be noted that legal information and content can rapidly become out of date and we give no undertaking to keep this website up to date. All liability for any loss or damage of any kind which may be suffered as a result of accessing and using the information and/or content of this website is hereby excluded to the full extent permitted by law.